May 28, 2009

Fun With Headlines

A telling pair, from this week's issue of Investment News:

Given the track record of the fund industry's faddish product roll-outs, we'd counsel more caution than optimism on those absolute-return funds (as we did a while back in this space).

May 28, 2009 6:12:53 AM | Mutual Funds, Wall Street

NEXT POST
Real Returns on Residential Real Estate As we've noted in this space (here and here, for example), with a few local/short-term exceptions, residential real estate has been a pretty lousy investment. So we were pleased to see Brett Arends weigh in on this question in this morning's Wall Street Journal. An excerpt: Conventional wisdom long held that home ownership was a route to wealth, and the imputed rent -- in other words, the right to live in your home -- was just part of the value you got from it. Under that widespread view, the recent housing bust was simply a temporary, though deep, pothole. Yet...
PREVIOUS POST
BrightScope Responds to the ICI BrightScope's Ryan Alfred has posted the latest entry in the ongoing debate between leaders of the transparency movement (where BrightScope is at the head of the class) and the mutual fund industry's Investment Company Institute. For what it's worth, we've contributed our thoughts here, here, and here. You should read Ryan's post in its entirety, but we think this is the most important thing he wrote: The more we listen to both sides on this issue the more we realize that any single number used to describe 401k fees, be it asset-weighted, plan-weighted or participant-weighted is not all that useful...