March 31, 2010

BrightScope and Vanguard

Two weeks ago, Vanguard's Steve Utkus posted a thoughtful, if not quite fully informed, take on the work of our friends at BrightScope.*

We encourage you to read Steve's original post here.

Then take a look at Ryan Alfred's response at BrightScope's blog.

We're pleased to see these types of exchanges. They should help everyone who cares about the future of retirement security in this country understand what is being done well and what can be done more efficiently and effectively.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

* Full disclosure: Interlake has believed in BrightScope's basic approach from the outset and we subscribed to their Advisor Central service in October, 2009. We want them to succeed, we believe they will (more to the point, we see that they are succeeding), and we think their data and related services can help us bring a truly fiduciary approach to retirement plan participants at companies of any size and shape.

Mar 31, 2010 11:31:12 AM | Mutual Funds, Public Policy, Retirement Plans, Wall Street

NEXT POST
New DOL Proposal on Index Funds We ran across an interesting piece in InvestmentNews on a recent DOL trial balloon concerning passive and active funds in ERISA plans. Here's the essence of the DOL proposal: Specifically, financial advisers point to a recent proposal in which the Labor Department asked whether computer-based advice models should take into account only the fees and expenses of a mutual fund--and not its historical returns--since they aren't guaranteed. If fees and expenses are the primary factor when recommending funds for 401(k) plans, these advisers contend, index funds will win out over actively managed funds every time. The next paragraph is classic...
PREVIOUS POST
For Most 401(k) Plans, Less is More Writing for the CBS News and MoneyWatch, Larry Swedroe shares a few classic findings from a recent study of mutual fund selection and replacement in 401(k) plans. If you're in the business of sponsoring or advising a defined-contribution retirement plan, you should give this a good, hard look (emphasis added): As one would expect, when administrators change offerings, they choose funds that did well in the past. After all, who would choose a fund that had performed poorly? Funds that were added to plans had positive alphas for both one- and three-year periods prior to the change. And, unsurprisingly, managers...